Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!virtech!cpcahil
From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: 2nd call to vote comp.unix.sco, undecided?
Message-ID: <1990May8.011123.18071@virtech.uucp>
Date: 8 May 90 01:11:23 GMT
References: <836@sixhub.UUCP> <1990May1.161300.8249@oct1.UUCP>
Reply-To: cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill)
Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc., Sterling VA
Lines: 28

In article <1990May1.161300.8249@oct1.UUCP> mason@oct1.UUCP (David M. Mason) writes:
>In article <836@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
>writes:
>>In article <1990Apr26.130747.6047@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP
>(Conor P. Cahill) writes:
>> 
>>| Several quotes about the "need" for comp.unix.sco were quoted in
>>| this article.  It appears to me that most of them were from SCO.
>
>Cahill's incoming mail looks somewhat like the result of some sort of
>internal office memo at SCO saying "get out there and post `Viva
>comp.unix.sco' ".

You are reading things wrong.  I pointed out that the propoganda in 
the second call to votes appeared to be mostly, if not all, from SCO.

You should be sure to get your attributions right before posting.

Besides, don't most people like to be called by thier first name?

>This is strictly my opinion.

Ditto.

-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170