Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!agate!e260-3f!c60c-3cf
From: c60c-3cf@e260-3f.berkeley.edu (Dan Kogai)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Stupid UNIX command syntax (Re: Stupidest UNIX Command)
Keywords: uniq, indent
Message-ID: <1990May5.233549.4987@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 5 May 90 23:35:49 GMT
References: <23183@adm.BRL.MIL> <916@emdeng.Dayton.NCR.COM> <747@mwtech.UUCP> <7Z739XAxds13@ficc.uu.net>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Organization: UC Bezerkeley
Lines: 25

In article <7Z739XAxds13@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <747@mwtech.UUCP> martin@mwtech.UUCP (Martin Weitzel) writes
>about an innofensive program called "uniq".
>> But there is something that allways annoys me. If you
>> don't know right now, take a look at the manual.
>> Maybe this will pay some day ....
>
>You mean, the way if you have files named a and b, and you say "uniq ?",
>it will trash "b"? Indent does it too. It's really a sick idea.
>
	But at least indent makes backup!  Uniq just kills it.  But it's
not hard to implement uniq an make it safe.  Well, I don't use uniq as
often as grep|sed and never killed file by that...

---
##################  Dan The "I grok therefore I am God" Man
+ ____  __  __   +  (Aka Dan Kogai)
+     ||__||__|  +  E-mail:     dankg@ocf.berkeley.edu
+ ____| ______   +  Voice:      415-549-6111
+ |     |__|__|  +  USnail:     1730 Laloma Berkeley, CA 94709
+ |___  |__|__|  +              U.S.A
+     |____|____ +  Disclaimer: I'd rather be blackmailed for my long .sig
+   \_|    |     +              than give up my cool name in Kanji. And my
+ <- THE MAN  -> +              citizenship of People's Republic o' Berkeley
##################              has nothing 2 do w/ whatever I post, ThanQ.