Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!samsung!usc!snorkelwacker!bionet!PSUVM.PSU.EDU!HXH5
From: HXH5@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
Newsgroups: bionet.population-bio
Subject: Re: phylogenetic autocorrelation
Message-ID: <9005260224.AA04762@largo.ig.com>
Date: 26 May 90 02:26:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@genbank.BIO.NET
Lines: 5

I read one of those papers once and it seemed to me that the covariance
between ecology and phylogeny was (arbitrarily) added to the phylogenetic
variance--then the paper concluded that phylogeny accounted for whatever
it was, mating systems and dimorphism or something.  I never followed
up on it.  Is this part of the same thing??