Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!xylogics!transfer!lectroid!bigbootay!dswartz
From: dswartz@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Dan Swartzendruber)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: unexpected CPU behavior [was 486 bugs -- it's in there!]
Message-ID: <1431@lectroid.sw.stratus.com>
Date: 30 May 90 19:42:01 GMT
References: <1990May27.110726.17007@xavax.com> <16744@haddock.ima.isc.com> <2159@sauron.Columbia.NCR.COM> <1429@lectroid.sw.stratus.com> <25336@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: usenet@lectroid.sw.stratus.com
Reply-To: dswartz@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Dan Swartzendruber)
Distribution: na
Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering.
Lines: 7

Keep in mind most of the places that had this problem with
the 68000 had it ~7-10 years ago.  At this point in time,
few if any C compilers had the volatile keyword.

--

Dan S.