Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: jej@chinet.chi.il.us (joe jesson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: AT&TMail, MCI, or IBM IN Global Mail????
Message-ID: <8430@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 30 May 90 02:15:10 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: joe jesson <jej@chinet.chi.il.us>
Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX
Lines: 12
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 397, Message 7 of 12


  Would like to tie a large company-wide network to a large gateway
for PROFS to Telex, FAX, Internet, etc. and would like to select
either AT&TMail, IBM IN, UUNET, or SoftSwitch (own a small switch).

Rumors have it that AT&TMail is *expensive* and uses a Bisync (what?)
link and Internet is *only* for research. Maybe IBM IN the best???

Give me your thoughts!!


joe