Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: 0+ Calls Where N0X/N1X in Use
Message-ID: <8556@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 1 Jun 90 14:30:43 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 9
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 407, Message 7 of 10


Doug Reuben and David Tamkin write about 0+ calls in areas which have
N0X/N1X prefixes.  All such areas that I know of require 0+NPA+7D for
all 0+ calls--EXCEPT that 213 area (now 213/818) used to require only
0+7D for 0+ calls within NPA.  There, as I heard from this Digest way
back around 1981 when JSol was Moderator, you needed timeout to
distinguish between, say, 0-413-2345 and 0-413-234-5678.  But buried
in a recent Los Angeles area directory was 0+NPA+7D, apparently for
all 0+ calls.