Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Cardinal numbers or unsigned int..
Message-ID: <Ft*!k&2@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 26 May 90 07:12:02 GMT
References: <Fisw-a2@cs.psu.edu> <1990May25.193305.14920@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Penn State University Computer Science
Lines: 40
In-Reply-To: philip@Kermit.Stanford.EDU's message of 25 May 90 19:33:05 GMT


In article <1990May25.193305.14920@Neon.Stanford.EDU> philip@Kermit.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick) writes:


   In article <Fisw-a2@cs.psu.edu>, melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D
   Mellinger) writes:
   > 
   > I am learning X Window and have just found out that MIT borrowed the
   > Cardinal type from Pascal.
			^^^^^^
   Don't you mean Modula-2?

   Philip Machanick
   philip@pescadero.stanford.edu


Maybe it was Modula-2.  I have never learned it though, so I can't be
sure.  I must have picked it up from somewhere because I have
previously used it in my Pascal code.  Anyway, doesn't it seem
unsightly to see three names for exactly the same thing in C++ code.


void foo(unsigned int a, u_int b, Cardinal c)
{
	.
	.
	.
}

C++ is suppose to be a language for large projects. Reusability in the
form of class libraries is suppose to be important(will this ever
become a reality?).  Although the three definitions are equivalent,
mixing class libraries or code from different programmers makes the
program look ugly (IMHO), if all three types declarations are used.  I
guess it's a question of style.  I personally don't like unsigned int
because it's two words and it's too long.  Are there any generally
accepted coding standards that are used by groups of people working on
large projects(I guess MIT uses Cardinal)?

-Mike