Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ccut!kogwy!new1!rd2!kimura
From: kimura@zuken.co.jp (Naoto Kimura)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: implicit conv to int in subscript
Message-ID: <KIMURA.90May31102210@rd13.zuken.co.jp>
Date: 31 May 90 15:22:10 GMT
References: <684@dyndata.UUCP> <2670@ektools.UUCP>
Sender: news@new1.zuken.co.jp
Organization: ZUKEN Inc. Yokohama, JAPAN
Lines: 16
In-reply-to: randolph@ektools.UUCP's message of 30 May 90 14:22:36 GMT

In article <2670@ektools.UUCP> randolph@ektools.UUCP (Gary L. Randolph) writes:

 > 
 > #So, should this work?
 > 
 > Yes.
 > I have tested your code using Sun C++ 2.0 and all is as you had
 > hoped!  (minor point: Obviously f() should be defined as a void function)
 > 

I  have tested using Glockenspiel C Preprocessor, release 1.2 E too and 
there was no problem but trivial warning.


--
Kimura Naoto