Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!netcom!ergo
From: ergo@netcom.UUCP (Isaac Rabinovitch)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C obfuscator
Message-ID: <12599@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 28 May 90 23:18:42 GMT
References: <12546@netcom.UUCP> <1990May28.153754.20280@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290 guest}
Lines: 10

henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:


>Don't judge his purposes by your local bad examples.  The usual alternatives
>to distributing obfuscated source are distributing only binaries (usually
>for machines you don't have) or not distributing at all.  Which do you prefer?

That wasn't the choice in the case I was thinking of.  It was a case of
someone avoiding distributing source code he had promised to distribute.
But it does seem I'm guilty of jumping to conclusions.