Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!agate!shelby!cis!daniel
From: daniel@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Daniel Weise)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re: LeLisp info request: Le-Lisp is alive and well
Message-ID: <DANIEL.90May24163433@dolores.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 24 May 90 23:34:33 GMT
References: <1990May2.021557.24873@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <18084@well.sf.ca.us>
	<8082@ilog.UUCP> <18139@well.sf.ca.us> <136167@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Sender: news@cis.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Followup-To: comp.lang.scheme
Organization: Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University
Lines: 10
In-reply-to: vladimir@prosper's message of 24 May 90 17:45:35 GMT


  In article <136167@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> vladimir@prosper  writes:
   Would you care to elaborate?  What features are sufficiently better than, 
   Scheme or Common Lisp to justify having YAVL (Yet Another Version of Lisp),
   another standard, another learning curve?

Please, everyone, let's not have this discussion on comp.lang.scheme.
Please keep it in your own private mailboxes.

Daniel