Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!kth.se!news From: johani@mowitz.nada.kth.se (Johan Ihren) Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme Subject: Re: using SCIX Message-ID: Date: 1 Jun 90 00:30:36 GMT References: <2087@male.EBay.Sun.COM> Sender: news@kth.se (News Administrator) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology Lines: 33 In-reply-to: garey@gtm.EBay.Sun.COM's message of 31 May 90 21:34:34 GMT In <2087@male.EBay.Sun.COM> garey@gtm.EBay.Sun.COM (Garey Mills) writes: > Can anyone help me with a problem I am having using > SCIX? I have something written in Scheme using the > HWOOPS package and I want to compile it to C using > the Scheme-to-C compiler. The compiler gives up on > the 'define-class.sc' macro included in the SCIX > package. Am I doing something wrong? Hard to say without more information, but it doesn't sound like it. Strange, though, that the compiler barfs on define-class after having evaluated it lots of times when compiling the system... > Should I be > creating an intermediate file using the define-class > macro (and how do I do that?)? If what you mean is "should I compile define-class separately" then the answer is no, as it is not possible to compile a macro. It is only possible to compile something that has been expanded by a macro. > Any help would be appreciated. Send the files to scix@nada.kth.se and we'll look into it. PS. SCIX version 0.97 is due before the end of June. It has been delayed because we've had to concentrate on exams in other subjects for a while... Johan Ihren Dept. of Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Email: johani@nada.kth.se -or- !sunic!nada!johani