Path: utzoo!attcan!ncrcan!becker!censor!comspec!tvcent!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!mcsun!unido!ztivax!ap542
From: ap542@ztivax.UUCP (Helmut Peisl)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: smail 3.x or sendmail?
Message-ID: <1126@ztivax.UUCP>
Date: 7 May 90 06:17:44 GMT
References: <231@dynasys.UUCP>
Reply-To: ap542@ztivax.UUCP (Mike Hoffmann)
Organization: Siemens AG in Munich, W-Germany
Lines: 16

In article <231@dynasys.UUCP> jessea@dynasys.UUCP () writes:
>I have heard some mention that they had completely replaced sendmail
>with smail 3.x.  Is smail 3.x a complete replacement for sendmail and
>why would I continue to run sendmail if smail 3.x is so much better?
>Thanx in advance for enlightening me on this.

I'd be grateful, if the responses were posted.
I'm facing replacing a buggy sendmail, to which I have no source,
with smail 3.x. Should I do it?

Thanks
Mike
-- 
Mike Hoffmann, Dept DI AP 542
Siemens AG, Munich, West Germany
Disclaimer: none required in Germany, I think/hope/was told by my lawyer