Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!nosc!crash!orbit!pnet51!bga
From: bga@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Bruce Albrecht)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A different review of the A3000
Message-ID: <2510@orbit.cts.com>
Date: 25 May 90 21:05:07 GMT
Sender: news@orbit.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.
Lines: 13

I don't really want to get involved in the discussion of the A3000 vs.
workstations, because I don't care whether the A3000 is labelled a workstation
or not.  However, I agree with Wayne Throop that a multi-user system would be
nice.  It may not be absolutely necessary (as John Sparks claims), but I'd
rather have one, even if the default is that there is only one user, and it
can do anything.  After all, it's a lot easier to ignore the multi-user stuff,
than to fake it.  And I can think of several things where it would be very
handy to have multi-user, like for NFS access, BBS's, and other forms of
remote access.

UUCP: {amdahl!bungia, uunet!rosevax, crash}!orbit!pnet51!bga
ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!bga@nosc.mil
INET: bga@pnet51.orb.mn.org