Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!sagpd1!monty
From: monty@sagpd1.UUCP (Monty Saine)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Microsoft products
Message-ID: <795@sagpd1.UUCP>
Date: 30 May 90 14:50:39 GMT
References: <04206.AA04206@sosaria.imp.com> <1990May29.212202.10871@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: monty@sagpd1.UUCP (Monty Saine)
Organization: Scientific Atlanta, Government Products Div, San Diego, CA
Lines: 17

In article <1990May29.212202.10871@watdragon.waterloo.edu> gpsteffler@tiger.uwaterloo.ca (Glenn Steffler) writes:
>
>They have already set up a very neat system where code is shared across 
>architectures (MAC,OS/2,DOS) that allows for releases on the major platforms
>very close to each other...the Amiga would be a very difficult platform to 
>provide for...not too much for a company with MS's resources, but I think the
>Amiga does fine with the current software vendors anyway...Microsoft would
>be an invaluable addition...but I ain't gonna happen.
>

	If they have this "very neat system where code is shared across 
architectures" why do you think the Amiga would be a "very difficult
platform to provide for" sounds like a typical microsu**k thinking to me.
I for one am VERY glad that they do not support the Amiga. It give the 
Amiga a better sense of reality.

Monty Saine