Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!van-bc!
From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Complaints about Amiga OS 2.0
Keywords: 2.0 GUI
Message-ID: <1662@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 30 May 90 11:26:38 GMT
Lines: 30
Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips>
To: van-bc!rnews

In <32421@auc.UUCP>, rar@auc.UUCP (Rodney Ricks) writes:
>In article <3246.AA3246@pnt.CAM.ORG> Martin@pnt.CAM.ORG (Martin Taillefer) writes:
> 
>>>   I also have a beef with the speach support with Amiga OS 2.0.
>>
>>                                               ... Please reserve these
>>comments for the final release.
>
>If we did that, then it would be TOO LATE!!!  We need to make requests
>before things are finalized, or else we'll just be whining about what should
>have been in there.  I believe the people at Commodore have heard MORE than
>enough whining about what should have been done.  I'm sure that they
>would agree.

It's already too late to change a lot of things sbout 2.0, and requests for
enhancements that fall into this category will not be acted upon until the
release after 2.0. There is a big difference between a request for enhancement
and a gripe about 'the way it is', when the 'the way it is' is taken from
observation of a prerelease. What Martin is saying is that comments on 2.0
should be reserved for 2.0.

-larry

--
The raytracer of justice recurses slowly, but it renders exceedingly fine.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+