Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!digi!woodwrk!dick
From: dick@woodwrk.UUCP (Richard H. Wood, Garland, Texas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: UNIX and Disk Controllers (was: What will happen to the A3000 ROM sockets?)
Message-ID: <3532.AA3532@woodwrk.UUCP>
Date: 28 May 90 13:55:43 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Lines: 21

>In article <3723@darkstar.ucsc.edu> davids@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Dave Schreiber) writes:
>>Does this mean that the Amiga's Unix doesn't require (specifically) an
>>A2091?  I.E. would any board that follows the RDB standard (such as
>>the Hardframe) be compatibile with Unix?  Thanks again.
>

Several responses have been posted to this question, but none have
addressed MY queriosity:  namely, "will the A2090a (autobooting variant
of the A2090, as I understand it) be compatible with Unix?"

Inquiring minds would like to know. (as well as owners of the A2090a
like me who were led to believe it'd work when we bought our A2500's,
the ones without the /30 suffix, that is---before there WAS a A2091,
:-( )

--
--d.
___________   _______   
Dick Wood//  / \   / \ |Become an  |  {texbell|texsun}!digi!woodwrk!dick|
     \\ //  /   \ /   \|  Organ    |{egsner|texbell}!lerami!woodwrk!dick|
 Amiga\X/oodwork Bench |      Donar|             dwood@digi.lonestar.org|