Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!mcsun!ukc!dcl-cs!gdt!mapjilg
From: mapjilg@gdr.bath.ac.uk (J I L Gold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'
Keywords: asm a68k lattice
Message-ID: <1990May29.122539.18550@gdr.bath.ac.uk>
Date: 29 May 90 12:25:39 GMT
References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <2812@crash.cts.com>
Organization: Bath University Computing Services, UK
Lines: 29

In article <2812@crash.cts.com> jcs@crash.cts.com (John Schultz) writes:
>.
>
>
>
>  I've used CAPE 2.0, Devpac 2, and Lattice's Asm.  Devpac is by far the
>  etc etc...
>68020/030 and 68881/68882. Devpac is supposed to have an 020/030/881/882
>version someday.  

They do now! There is a Devpac Proffesional package out now, at a much higher
price, it has to be said.

> etc etc...
>programmer will already have done the optimizations. You can do pretty
>much whatever you want with any of these assemblers; only personal taste
>differentiates.  

Well just try the equivalent of INCBIN with either Lattice OR current versions
of A68k (I've mailed Charlie Gibbs, the author, and he's said the next version
will have it.)

>  John
> 


-- 
#  J.Gold                            |    mapjilg@uk.ac.bath.gdr               #
#  University of Bath , UK           |    jilg@uk.ac.bath.maths                #