Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!amdahl!netcom!lyle
From: lyle@netcom.UUCP (Lyle Fong)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ANSI is not IBM (was Re: Agate)
Message-ID: <12629@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 29 May 90 18:06:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.12629
References: <13128@wpi.wpi.edu> <12591@netcom.UUCP> <24526@athertn.Atherton.COM>
Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290 guest}
Lines: 13

Hmm..  never knew that those IBM characters weren't ANSI..  but.. it has been
used interchangably on almost all IBM BBS's..  so..  So, then.. what IS
the ANSI standard?  But.. going back to the original subject, AGATE is not
worth the trouble..  it does not achieve anything ProTERM or another 
term program with VT-100 can achieve..  does have some ANSI characters, but
only a small sub-set of them.

Lyle

-- 

- America Online - Lyle Fong
- OggNET         - Corned Beef (#317/Dragon's Lair)