Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!jones.cis.ohio-state.edu!george From: george@jones.cis.ohio-state.edu (George M. Jones) Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore Subject: Re: Problems with flush ? Message-ID: Date: 1 Jun 90 16:36:55 GMT References: <9006011541.AA26530@cs.niu.edu> Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: george@tut.cis.ohio-state.eduGeorge M. Jones Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer & Information Science Lines: 21 In-reply-to: rickert@CS.NIU.EDU's message of 1 Jun 90 15:41:40 GMT In article <9006011541.AA26530@cs.niu.edu> rickert@CS.NIU.EDU (Neil Rickert) writes: george@CIS.OHIO-STATE.EDU writes: >Anybody got a clue as to why the input buffers were not flushed ? Is >there a known problem with TIOCFLUSH ? You omitted the important information. Were you logged in at the terminal, at a slave port on an annex, or with the 'telnet', 'rlogin' or 'call' protocol? Before posting I tested it both on the console and using telnet from another machine. I just tested rlogin, telnet and call from the annex. There is no difference. It appears that the input buffer is never being flushed. ---George -=- OSU Computer & Inf. Science 2036 Neil Ave.,Columbus,Ohio 43210. 614-292-7325 george@cis.ohio-state.edu or ...!osu-cis!george X windows. Flaky and built to stay that way.