Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!alcor.usc.edu!dwu From: dwu@alcor.usc.edu (Daniel Wu) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: PC Magazine's evaluation of Northgate Summary: Does Northgate really suffer from compatibility/reliability problems? Keywords: northgate reliablity compatibility pc magazine Message-ID: <9871@chaph.usc.edu> Date: 25 May 90 02:31:43 GMT Sender: news@chaph.usc.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 36 I've been in the market for a 386 machine, and was seriously considering Northgate. I looked through some past isssues of PC Magazine, and found an article titled "Endurance Tests: 386 and portables" in the Jan 16, 1990 issue (Technical Excellence). I was favorably considering Northgate, because I heard some very nice comments about their construction and service from the net, but the article contained a few negative comments. They were reviewing the Elegance 386/25 with 256K of read/write cache: While this machine can hardly be touched for sheer performance, the Elegance is usually dependable but plagued by a few hiccups when it comes to reliability and compatilibity. For instance if you choose to bypass the power-up self test (POST), the 600 MB hard disk doesn't have a chane ro come up to operational speed and will not boot the system. The solution: don't bypass the memory test. [Next paragraph about machine failing to boot until memory chips were firmly re-seated...] Compatibility testing also revealed some bugaboos. I was unable to get a QMS JetScript add-in board to work. Lotus Express locked up the system every time I attempted to load it. While I was unable to come up with a solution to the former problem, the latter was solved by running Express in a window under Microsoft Windows/386. Has anybody out there experienced these kinds of problems? I would have settled on Northgate if it were not for this single unfavorable review. Comments anyone? I'd like to hear other people's experiences with this machine. Thank you Daniel