Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!spdcc!mirror!rayssd!anomaly!mike
From: mike@anomaly.UUCP (Michael P. Deignan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: everex (lack of) service
Keywords: disk failure, seagate, everex, bad (no) service
Message-ID: <1687@anomaly.UUCP>
Date: 28 May 90 01:24:12 GMT
References: <24812@usc.edu> <753@tharr.UUCP>
Organization: Anomaly - Rhode Island's Open Access *NIX - 1 (401) 455-0347 PEP
Lines: 17

In article <753@tharr.UUCP> chris@tharr.UUCP (Chris Allen) writes:
>If this was generally the case then how come they didn't go bankrupt
>long ago? Any company that gives consistently bad service is not
>going to be a success. I am sure that the directors of Everex are aware
>of this and I am equally sure that they have many thousands of satisfied
>customers.

Unfortunately, these types of companies spend thousands on advertising, and
unsuspecting consumers don't know any better. So, they end up propagating
themselves for quite some time...

(I have no connection with, nor experience with, Everex, and only refer to
companies who have poor service in general...)

MD
-- 
-- UUCP:     ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mike       ------------------------------ -- Internet: mike@anomaly.sbs.com                --   "From Sick Minds Come  -- -- USnail:   Box 17220, Esmond, RI 02917         --     Sick Products...."   -- -- 1/401/455/0347 Telebit - 1/401/273/4669 Voice ------------------------------