Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!umich!samsung!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!dptg!pegasus!psrc
From: psrc@pegasus.ATT.COM (Paul S. R. Chisholm)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland Turbo C++ 1.0!
Summary: sorry, no MS Windows support yet
Message-ID: <4776@pegasus.ATT.COM>
Date: 18 May 90 19:04:34 GMT
References: <4693@pegasus.ATT.COM> <306@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 17

In article <306@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>, ckindel@cs.arizona.edu (Charles E. Kindel, Jr. [Tigger]) writes:
> The press release doesn't mention Windows support!  It was my understanding
> that Turbo C++ would provide this.  Is it an oversight in the PR or are
> we Windows programmers still being ignored by Borland.

Nope, Turbo C++ 1.0 and Turbo C 2.0 still don't support MS Windows.
I haven't heard anything official (or unofficial) from Borland, but
they've made general statements that they're moving toward Windows
compatibility.

(I'm sure Walter's glad to hear this.-)

Paul S. R. Chisholm, AT&T Bell Laboratories
att!pegasus!psrc, psrc@pegasus.att.com, AT&T Mail !psrchisholm
I'm not speaking for the company, I'm just speaking my mind.
I have no relationship with Borland except as a happy customer
(but then again, I'm not writing MS Windows applications.)