Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!lfcs!nick From: nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: New MS Windows (?) Message-ID: <4347@castle.ed.ac.uk> Date: 30 May 90 10:43:26 GMT References: <34844@<1990May23> <71100007@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <3476@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU> Reply-To: nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) Organization: Jenny Agutter Appreciation Society of Edinburgh Lines: 25 In-reply-to: halam@umnd-cpe-cola.d.umn.edu (haseen alam) In article <3476@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU>, halam@umnd-cpe-cola (haseen alam) writes: >Also, how about some technical info for programmers. Is windows totally in >software? Will it support toolbox type routines that can be called from >various programming languages? > >Correct me if I'm wrong, software emulation is always SLOWER than hardware. >So windows will always be soft and mushy!!! 8-) Last time I looked, the Mac Toolbox was software... :-) (not counting whatever tricks the IIfx might pull, which I know nothing about). I agree that MS Windows stinks, though. I'm now a happy new owner of an SE/30. I will be sure to show it to anybody who thinks that windowing PCs are cool. >Haseen. Nick. -- Nick Rothwell, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh. nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk !mcsun!ukc!lfcs!nick ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Ich weiss jetzt was kein Engel weiss