Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!shelby!daemon
From: lane@sumex-aim.stanford.edu (Christopher Lane)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: re: NeXT on Campus Conspiracy
Message-ID: <1987@shelby.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 30 May 90 15:42:29 GMT
Sender: daemon@shelby.Stanford.EDU
Lines: 28

Contrary to most responses (to the net and to me), my 'NeXT on Campus
Conspiracy' posting was not to be taken quite so seriously.  I'm neither upset
that the screen images had the same dock, nor that the KSL wasn't included in
the Stanford profile--honestly. :-)

My real feeling about fake docks is, why go to the trouble when by stripping
the dock all together you can make the rest of the screen image larger and
more readable on the page?

In <1990May25.235826.17488@portia.Stanford.EDU>, davef@jessica.stanford.edu
writes:
>(If you look carefully, you'll see that the relevent apps on the Dock
>have been launched.)  There are some time/date/dock differences since
>some shots probably had to be redone.

Sorry, I'm not buying this one--I can't see that the relevant apps on the dock
have been launched (they've all been launched) and all the docks but one have
11:59 pm on them!

In <1990May29.074012.9487@portia.Stanford.EDU>, bokonon@amy1.stanford.edu
writes:
>Here are some comments from Chris Lane's May 25th posting:

I just hate it when people misspell my name, I can just smell another
conspiracy in the wind.... ;-)

- Christopher
-------