Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:51696 comp.sys.zenith:314
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!texbell!texsun!letni!mic!cms2!tomf
From: tomf@cms2.UUCP (Tom Fortner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.zenith
Subject: Re: Two Drives under Zenith 3.3+
Message-ID: <208@cms2.UUCP>
Date: 31 May 90 23:25:09 GMT
References: <1990May25.090543.22345@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <2975@unocss.unomaha.edu>
Reply-To: tomf@cms2.UUCP (Tom Fortner)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Christian Medical & Dental Society
Lines: 20

In article <2975@unocss.unomaha.edu> cs002@unocss.unomaha.edu (cs002) writes:
>In article <1990May25.090543.22345@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>, wargopl@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Peter L. Wargo) writes:
>>    C:                 0
>>    D:                 1
>>    E:                 0
>>    F:                 0
>>    G:                 1
>> Strange, I woulda thought all of physical drive 0, then all of 1, but no 
This is not unique to Zenith. We have a generic clone (I think it has a 
Charisma motherboard) with a Micropolis and a Microscience drive. Each is
MFM formatted to their capacity, the Micropolis with 3 logical drives, the
Microscience with 2. The same pattern of drive assignments occurred. 
This seems to be a characteristic of Dos's drive assignment routine.
Tom

-- 
    Tom Fortner                        ** The greatest gift a man can offer 
    Christian Medical & Dental Society ** his Maker is a repentant committed 
    UUCP: cms2!tomf                    ** life and a disciplined, diligent 
    INTERNET: tomf@cms2.lonestar.org   ** mind.