Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!mindcrf.UUCP!karish
From: karish@mindcrf.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: <standards.h> on v3.1
Summary: Fixed?
Keywords: _ALL_SOURCE, _ANSI_C_SOURCE
Message-ID: <9005280210.AA14257@mindcrf.mindcraft.com>
Date: 28 May 90 02:10:49 GMT
References: <5475@ibmpa.UUCP>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Mindcraft, Inc.
Lines: 22

In article <5475@ibmpa.UUCP> jsalter@ibmsupt.UUCP (James Salter) writes:
   >Previous references to problems with the header file <standards.h> are
   >now incorrect.

My statement was that <standards.h> on 9013S1 was broken.  Is this
no longer true?  I'll have to take a look...

   >Please know that standards are being correctly adhered to, and
   >when you don't want/care about them ... well, that works just fine, too.

And does xlc do all this (on your machine, I guess) without generating
any spurious warnings?

When should the rest of us expect a build that includes this fix?

   >IP: ibmsupt!jsalter@uunet.uu.net                 "PS/2 it, or DIE!"
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                                     Yeah, sure.
-- 

	Chuck Karish		karish@mindcraft.com
	Mindcraft, Inc.		(415) 323-9000