Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!virtech!cpcahil
From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Tape backup performance on 386 ISA/EISA systems
Keywords: tape, performance, 386
Message-ID: <1990Jun2.055524.28129@virtech.uucp>
Date: 2 Jun 90 05:55:24 GMT
References: <1990May25.123302.26061@virtech.uucp> <7596@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Reply-To: cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill)
Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc., Sterling VA
Lines: 18

In article <7596@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) writes:
>In article <1990May25.123302.26061@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
><
><	/bin/time sh -c "find . -print | cpio -oBcC 10240 > /dev/rmt0"
><
>
>Doesn't cpio bitch about the inclusion of both the "B" and "C 10240" command
>tail?  They're redundant/competing flags to cpio...  ("B" == "C 512").

No. it doesn't bitch.  However it is redundant.  I just can't type in "cpio -o"
without the inclusion of 'B' and 'c'.



-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170