Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:5306 comp.unix.questions:22429 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!virtech!cpcahil From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.unix.questions Subject: Tape backup performance on 386 ISA/EISA systems Keywords: tape, performance, 386 Message-ID: <1990May25.123302.26061@virtech.uucp> Date: 25 May 90 12:33:02 GMT Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc. Lines: 52 I am trying to collect data on the performance of the different tape backup systems available for 386 bases Unix systems. What I am trying to obtain is the speed in MB/minute of backing up a file system to tape. In order to be meaningful, the file system must be at least 30MB and be backed up using the following command (so that everybody uses the same mechanism): /bin/time sh -c "find . -print | cpio -oBcC 10240 > /dev/rmt0" Note that you may adjust the block size (10240) as you feel is appropriate for your system as long as you tell me what you used. Obviously you might also need to change the tape device name. I would like results for any tape drive you got out there including 1/4", 9-track, DAT, 8mm, etc. If you do run the test please send me the following info: CPU: Tape drive: Disk Drive & controller: OS: Command: Time: Size of file system: For example on my system it would be filled in as follows: CPU: 33Mhz 80386 Tape drive: Archive 60MB 1/4" Cartridge Disk info: CDC Wren VI (676MB) w/DPT ESDI Controller with 2.5MB cache OS: 386/ix 2.0.2 Command: /bin/time sh -c "find . print | cpio -oBcC 10240 > /dev/rmt0" Time: Real: 10:50.7 User: 10.2 System: 1:17.9 FS size: 87472 blocks (reported by du -s .) Which turns out to be a rate of around 4.03 MB/Minute (not much of a screamer). Please run the test when there is essentially no load on the system so that the tests will be run under the same conditions (i.e. running the test while you are un-batching news will have a significant detrimental effect on the performanc and thereby give bad figures for your tape drive). Email or post your results as you feel fit. I would recommend emailing them to me and I will post the results after a couple of weeks. Thanks in advance. -- Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc., uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 Sterling, VA 22170