Xref: utzoo alt.sys.sun:922 comp.unix.questions:22563
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!myrias!aunro!atha!lyndon
From: lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg)
Newsgroups: alt.sys.sun,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Why /etc/mtab? (was: Example modification of /etc/mtab wanted)
Summary: why use a seperate file?
Message-ID: <1918@aurora.cs.athabascau.ca>
Date: 31 May 90 21:36:50 GMT
References: <1678@trlluna.trl.oz>
Followup-To: comp.unix.questions
Organization: Athabasca University
Lines: 21

[ Followups in comp.unix.questions ]

summer@atreides.trl.oz.au (Mark Summerfield - Switching) writes:

>The problem is that using mount() doesn't add an entry to /etc/mtab, so
>other commands (such as df, and umount) don't know about the
>filesystem.

Which leads me to pose the question:

	Why does Unix use a file to store mount information?

It seems to me that the proper way to determine what's mounted would
be to look in the kernel mount tables. It would be trivial to implement
a system call to return the information. Anyone know why the "ask the
kernel" approach was never taken?
-- 
      Lyndon Nerenberg  VE6BBM / Computing Services / Athabasca University
          {alberta,cbmvax,mips}!atha!lyndon || lyndon@cs.athabascau.ca
         Sendmail has been described as the largest program yet created
                 that does absolutely nothing. -- Mr. Protocol