Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!applix!jim
From: jim@applix.com (Jim Morton)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Non-letters on SLS support
Message-ID: <1052@applix.com>
Date: 2 Jun 90 01:47:28 GMT
References: <2265@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: APPLiX Inc., Westboro MA
Lines: 15

In article <2265@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>, (Wm E Davidsen Jr) writes:
}   One of my minor gripes with the SLS updates is that the cover letters
} don't clearly state what they are supposed to fix, add, or change. I
} have been looking at xnx133, which is a fix for "problems" with the WD1007
} controller. Unfortunately, it doesn't say exactly what it cures. Is this
} just to be blindly unstalled on all systems with the WD1007? 

Funny, just today I was re-reading that very cover sheet to try to get
a clue whether that fix might help a problem I'm having with a Compuadd
386/20 with an IDE disk controller. It's a shame after all the work the
SCO engineers put into an SLS update that they don't spend 30 seconds
more and put a few descriptive sentences in the cover sheet...
--
Jim Morton, APPLiX Inc., Westboro, MA
...uunet!applix!jim    jim@applix.com