Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!bwb
From: bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Message-ID: <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 27 May 90 15:38:38 GMT
References: <45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson)
Organization: Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 18

In article <30244@cup.portal.com> spage@cup.portal.com (S spage Page) writes:

>
>WfW is very close to Macintosh Word (except for its macro language).  Both
>WfW and Ami Pro can save in RTF (Rich Text Format).

I use Mac Word at work, WfW at home, and just disposed of my Word for DOS.
Mac Word, while graphically oriented, has the power of Word for DOS and IMHO
is well behind WfW.  I suspect an upgrade for Mac Word to incorporate the
newer features of WfW will be coming soon.

For simple quick notes, I use to use MS Write (over Word for DOS), but now
use WfW for all my short one pagers.

Bruce
---------------
Signature Block
---------------