Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardiner
From: gardiner@cs.umn.edu (David Gardiner)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Message-ID: <1990May29.125550.6048@cs.umn.edu>
Date: 29 May 90 12:55:50 GMT
References: <45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com> <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis - CSCI Dept.
Lines: 15

In article <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson) writes:

>Mac Word, while graphically oriented, has the power of Word for DOS and IMHO
>is well behind WfW.  I suspect an upgrade for Mac Word to incorporate the

I heard from someone in Microsoft that WfW has been their focus for a couple
of years and that all of the neat new stuff in Mac Word 4.0 was originally
developed for WfW.


David
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gardiner        University of Minnesota Computer Science Dept.
gardiner@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu