Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!umn-d-ub!cs.umn.edu!gardiner
From: gardiner@cs.umn.edu (David Gardiner)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Message-ID: <1990May29.130536.6739@cs.umn.edu>
Date: 29 May 90 13:05:36 GMT
References: <3378@altos86.Altos.COM> <1990May27.080939.18019@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <21617@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis - CSCI Dept.
Lines: 15

One nice thing about Ami Pro is that it is more visually oriented than
WfW.  Everything is WYSIWYG (ok, ok, WYSIWYGMoreOrLess).  This means
you don't have to keep going to preview mode since everything is
done in preview mode.  Adding a running header, for example, involves
simply typing in the top or bottom margin.

I have to agree with a previous posting, though, that both Ami Prof
or WfW are complex programs and using them effectively takes a LONG
time to learn.

David
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gardiner        University of Minnesota Computer Science Dept.
gardiner@umn-cs.cs.umn.edu