Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!dali!ogicse!emory!mephisto!gatech!galbp!samna!jeff
From: jeff@samna.UUCP (Jeff Barber)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Message-ID: <252@samna.UUCP>
Date: 30 May 90 14:13:37 GMT
References: <3378@altos86.Altos.COM> <1990May27.080939.18019@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> <21617@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Reply-To: jeff@samna.UUCP (Jeff Barber)
Organization: Draughtsman's Contractors
Lines: 17

In article <21617@boulder.Colorado.EDU> wallwey@snoopy.Colorado.EDU (WALLWEY DEAN WILLIAM) writes:
>On another note, after seeing Windows 3.0 in the store and now after
>reading the information I got on it included in my update notice, I am 
>cured of Mac-Envey and can even go so far as to say that Windows 3.0 is
>as good as(if not better than) Motif for X-windows! [X-windows as far as
>I know doesn't have proportional fonts].

Slight correction:
	X-windows *does* have proportional fonts.
	In fact, for X11R3 (the minimum that most people now have),
	Adobe and Bitstream donated several font families to the
	X world including Times, Helvetica, Courier, Charter,
	and New Century Schoolbook, each in several different sizes;
	these are all proportionally spaced.
	In addition to this, several fixed pitch fonts are provided.

Jeff