Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dali!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!comix!akm From: akm@comix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use? Summary: win3 makes a big difference to wfw Keywords: Word for Windows, MS Windows 3.0 Message-ID: <1990May31.013304.20407@cs.uoregon.edu> Date: 31 May 90 01:33:04 GMT References: <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> <7367@fy.sei.cmu.edu> <21701@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Sender: usenet@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner) Reply-To: akm@comix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) Organization: University of Oregon Computer Science Dept. Lines: 15 In article <21701@boulder.Colorado.EDU> wallwey@snoopy.Colorado.EDU (WALLWEY DEAN WILLIAM) writes: >I personaly think WFW is destined for great success....Has anybody >tryed it running under MS Windows 3.0? Is there much difference? A huge difference, though I haven't tried to quantify it as yet. I haven't run out of memory yet on my m/c, which is 386/4MB. I used to run out of memory with win 2.11.... kartik ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anant Kartik Mithal akm@cs.uoregon.edu Department of Computer Science akm@oregon.BITNET University of Oregon