Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!bu.edu!orc!decwrl!shelby!agate!bionet!ames!uhccux!todd
From: todd@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Todd Ogasawara)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QEMM Obsolete? was: Windows 3.0 and QEMM
Message-ID: <8020@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu>
Date: 2 Jun 90 09:01:46 GMT
References: <443@latvax8.lat.oz> <1990May25.152712.18579@cbnewsl.att.com> <7937@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> <1582@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au>
Reply-To: todd@uhccux.UUCP (Todd Ogasawara)
Organization: University of Hawaii
Lines: 18

In article <1582@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au> bxw@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au (Brad Willcott) writes:
>todd@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Todd Ogasawara) writes:
>>............................................... My guess is a lot of us
>>will be rebooting a lot when we move between Window 3.0 and DOS
>>configurations... todd
>Why?  Run the DOS apps under Windows, then you won't need all of those 
>headaches with rebooting different setups.

Assuming 100% of DOS applications will run in a 3.0 window, fine. But I
doubt if that is the case. And even, if 100% of aps do run in a window, at
least one set of benchmarks (Infoworld's) shows 3.0 to be slower than 2.11.
This means that we can expect to see performance penalties severe enough to
make us go back to DOS now and then ....todd
-- 
Todd Ogasawara, U. of Hawaii
UUCP:		{uunet,ucbvax,dcdwest}!ucsd!nosc!uhccux!todd
ARPA:		uhccux!todd@nosc.MIL		BITNET: todd@uhccux
INTERNET:	todd@uhccux.UHCC.HAWAII.EDU