Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!Bill.Scarborough
From: Bill.Scarborough@hnews.fidonet.org (Bill Scarborough)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: ADA
Message-ID: <12119@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 31 May 90 15:18:34 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Bill.Scarborough@hnews.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: The Handicap News, Shelton CT (203) 337-1607
Lines: 16
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 8551

     I have been told that there are places (outside of Texas, of course) 
where municipalities of less than 200,000 population have bus systems, 
even to the point of some small cities having one-bus systems.
     Austin had a bus system when it had only about 250,000 population.  
Currently, the Capital Metro Trans Auth includes some small towns which 
may in due time get some sort of local bus service.
      So the 200,000 or less amendment would do great damage by in effect 
repealing protections now found in the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
 

 * Origin: KramMail - The Handicap News 1-203-337-1607 (1:141/420)
--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!Bill.Scarborough
Internet: Bill.Scarborough@hnews.fidonet.org