Path: utzoo!censor!comspec!humvax!becker!geac!jtsv16!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!umigw!mthvax!wb8foz
From: wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (David Lesher)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Looking for WireWrapping Tool
Message-ID: <1990May5.191948.19847@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
Date: 5 May 90 19:19:48 GMT
References: <54986@bbn.COM> <7924@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu> <11025@cbmvax.commodore.com> <9904@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <11050@cbmvax.commodore.com> <556@entec.Wichita.NCR.COM> <557@entec.Wichita.NCR.COM>
Reply-To: wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (David Lesher)
Distribution: usa
Organization: NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews abusers
Lines: 15


When I worked with high speed data stuff (200 megsbtes/sec) we
used wirewrap boards. Wish I could remember the trade name, but
they cost mucho $$$$ each, and had several layers of gnd & Vcc,
with enough c between them to help filter stuff. 

Our problems were that the automatic wirelist--> wrap machine
link made errors (ooops!) that were hell to find. Of course,
that 74F stuff didn't help matters much. It considered anything
as a valid input and counted away.
-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu 
& no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335