Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!uci-ics!gateway From: ellene@microsoft.UUCP (Ellen EADES) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: "Off Our Backs" magazine cover Message-ID: <54993@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 1 Jun 90 23:42:30 GMT References: <265df9d5.1abd@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 55 Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu Reply-To:ellene@microsof.uucp (Ellen Eades) In article <265df9d5.1abd@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> dgross@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Dave Gross) writes: > I [...] found the latest issue of that oft-mentioned feminist journal > "Off Our Backs." The cover illustration was a brick wall with the following > graffiti: DEAD MEN DON'T RAPE. I infer from this that Dave was overcome with hostility and did not bother to read the article linked with the cover photograph. I happen to be a proud subscriber to _off our backs_. The brick wall runs along a bicycle trail in Arlington, Virginia, a trail that runs parallel to the I-66 highway. It is a well-lit trail that is used all hours of the day and night by runners, bikers, strollers, and folks heading to the subways. It is picturesque and peaceful, and it gives the impression of safety and security. On March 31st of this year a young woman took the trail on her way to the subway. She was traveling to her own birthday party. When she did not arrive, her friends went out looking for her. They found her in a back staircase the next morning. She had been pulled off the trail, beaten and stabbed to death. That same evening, the man who is the prime suspect in this murder also chased a jogging woman (she outran him) and then grabbed another woman off her bicycle and sexually assaulted her. The graffiti Dave refers to is now appearing along the wall at the site of the murder and assaults on women. In the current issue of _off our backs_, two women, Angela Johnson and Carol Anne Douglas (both members of the off our backs collective) write contrasting commentaries to the previous issue's cover article. Johnson finds the shock value of the graffiti empowering, and the anger a message to both women and men that rape and murder will no longer be tolerated by women, that women refuse to be victims any longer. Douglas writes that she loves individual men and while she understands and shares the pain and anger of the graffiti writers, she does not support the idea of killing all men (I point this out to refute Dave's implication that all feminists, or all of the oob collective, support the killing of men to eliminate the rape of women). I find _off our backs_ an extremely valuable news source for information on women's issues which I would not find in any ordinary journal. I learn that Amnesty International does not concern itself with wife-burning, sexual mutilation, the killing of prostitutes. I learn that the National Hate Crimes Bill specifically excludes women's issues. I learn that a recent Radical Women conference was more concerned with Marxism than with feminism. I read a feminist review of the movie "The Handmaid's Tale." I get to laugh with the comic strip _Dykes to Watch Out For_. I read abortion news, health news, international news. Dave just looks at the pictures, I guess. Ellen Eades (uunet!microsoft!ellene)