Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!udel!udccvax1!sun.udel.edu!barry
From: barry@sun.udel.edu (Barry Fausnaugh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: Netware 386
Message-ID: <11859@sun.udel.edu>
Date: 7 Jun 90 14:31:04 GMT
References: <157rwmira01@ULKYVX.bitnet>
Reply-To: barry@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Barry Fausnaugh)
Organization: University of Delaware
Lines: 16

In article <157rwmira01@ULKYVX.bitnet> rwmira01@ULKYVX.BITNET (Rob Miracle) writes:
>Some one was telling me that it was at this time Vaporware, if not all of it,
>then parts of it were (things like the PC-2-Mac parts).
>Is this true?  Is anybody running both AT&T StarGroup/Unix and Novell Netware
>386, as to be able to give me an idea if Novell really out-performs StarGroup?

I can't compare the two because I've only used Netware.  We are waiting for our
upgrade to 386 to come in any day here.  However, Novell has been pushing back
bits of pieces of Netware 386.  One of those pieces is Netware for Mac which is
currently slated to be releases in September I believe (I'm not from Novell so
don't quote me on that!)  I remember reading an article in LAN magazine a little
while ago that compared Netware 286 to Netware 386.  That's about the best I
can offer you for comparison though.  If you are interested in the article, let
me know and I'll find it and let you know where to find it.

Barry Fausnaugh