Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Baud per Hertz
Message-ID: <8808@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 8 Jun 90 13:31:46 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 17
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 422, Message 3 of 8


In article <8772@accuvax.nwu.edu> codex!peterd@uunet.uu.net (Peter
Desnoyers) writes:

> >Still, in the real world 7 baud on 5 Hz is very good!

> 9600bps over 3000 Hz is a good deal better, and is quite common.

Not really. Those 7 bauds at 6 bits per baud come to 42 bps over 5 Hz.
The highest rate I've heard of over the 3000 Hz band using PEP is something
like 24000 bps, or about 2.5 times as much as V.32. 18000 bps is not
terribly uncommon.

 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.  <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.