Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!keele!cs.glasgow.ac.uk!daemon From: sysnet@central1.lancaster.ac.uk (Postmaster) Newsgroups: mail.uk-sendmail-workers,comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Problem with X25 mail transfer ownership Message-ID: <7036.9006061101@central1.lancaster.ac.uk> Date: 6 Jun 90 14:25:32 GMT Sender: daemon@cs.glasgow.ac.uk Reply-To: postmaster@central1.lancaster.ac.uk Lines: 40 Approved: usenet@cs.glasgow.ac.uk Original-Sender: "Lancaster University PostMaster" X-System: Sequent Symmetry S81 with UNIX 4.2BSD X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2.022 PL10] I'm just installing Berkley sendmail 5.61 on our Sequent Symmetries, using UK-Sendmail 2.1 to build the configuration. With mail that is sent by hhsend/mhhcp, I get a strange effect on the transfer ownership. If I do /usr/lib/sendmail address then hhq shows the transfer belonging to daemon. But if I explicitly select the _same_ configuration file, with /usr/lib/sendmail -C/usr/lib/sendmail.cf address hhq shows the transfer as owned by the issuing user. The RFC822 headers in both messages are identical and correct. Our old sendmail (Berkely sendmail 4.something) didn't do this!). Am I doing something stupid? (I don't have a sendmail.fc file anywhere around that's being used in case 1, and I can't take the option of using sendmail 5.61IDA) Thanks, Alan -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | LANCASTER UNIVERSITY POSTMASTER Alan Phillips | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Computer Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK | | "A very long way from anywhere...." | | Phone: 0524-65201 x 3672 | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | JANET : postmaster@uk.ac.lancs.cent1 | | BITNET: postmaster%uk.ac.lancs.cent1@ukacrl | | UUCP : postmaster%uk.ac.lancs.cent1@ukc | | ARPA : postmaster%uk.ac.lancs.cent1@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+