Xref: utzoo comp.os.minix:11112 comp.unix.xenix:11971 comp.realtime:687 comp.arch:16398
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!dino!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!aglew
From: aglew@oberon.csg.uiuc.edu (Andy Glew)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.unix.xenix,comp.realtime,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Bloat costs
Message-ID: <AGLEW.90Jun8124200@oberon.csg.uiuc.edu>
Date: 8 Jun 90 17:42:00 GMT
References: <442@van-bc.UUCP> <266577FA.6D99@tct.uucp>
	<WSD.90Jun1130958@miles.cs.brown.edu>
	<1990Jun1.200333.10672@pmsmam.uucp> <23473@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois, Computer Systems Group
Lines: 7
In-Reply-To: bp@retiree.cis.ufl.edu's message of 8 Jun 90 17:47:48 GMT

>With an orthogonal architecture and a good compiler, you can write
>maintainable programs in high-level languages and still produce
>products that run quickly on machines with a lot fewer than 20 MIPS.

With a good compiler you don't care how orthogonal the architecture is.
--
Andy Glew, aglew@uiuc.edu