Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sco!seanf
From: seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: Macintosh OS (was: 68000 and Workstations.)
Message-ID: <6567@scolex.sco.COM>
Date: 8 Jun 90 17:18:08 GMT
References: <6392@scolex.sco.COM> <880001@iftccu.ca.boeing.com> <1990Jun6.133723.9416@agate.berkeley.edu> <:LZ3SIE@xds13.ferranti.com> <26637.266e6ed4@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>
Sender: news@sco.COM
Reply-To: seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan)
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Lines: 17

In article <26637.266e6ed4@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> ac08@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes:
>> And on the Amiga, and the NeXT, you get both.
>And once Amiga finishes polishing theirs, it'll be a helluva system.

Uhm, I hate to tell you this, but many people (including myself) prefer the
Amiga to the Mac.  Why?  It's faster, it has a "true OS," supports better
hardware, etc.

The GUI and CLI are both superior to what the Mac offers; the CLI is better
than the Mac can *ever* offer (excluding A/UX).

-- 
-----------------+
Sean Eric Fagan  | "It's a pity the universe doesn't use [a] segmented 
seanf@sco.COM    |  architecture with a protected mode."
uunet!sco!seanf  |         -- Rich Cook, _Wizard's Bane_
(408) 458-1422   | Any opinions expressed are my own, not my employers'.