Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!agate!e260-3c!laba-1ei
From: laba-1ei@e260-3c.berkeley.edu (Joseph Chung)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Difficulty in programming
Message-ID: <1990Jun5.084107.162@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 5 Jun 90 08:41:07 GMT
References: <2487@zipeecs.umich.edu> <1990Jun2.063414.10292@agate.berkeley.edu> <20990@estelle.udel.EDU> <1990Jun4.191035.12599@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: laba-1ei@e260-3c (Joseph Chung)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 26


Since I posted the original REPLY that generated so much flames, I feel that
I must clarify my position.  I in no way endorsed the IBM PC when I said it
was easier to program.  I own an Amiga and I like it very much, (yea even
programming it!)

Now, maybe all your emminences out there can help a little guy out.  I've
toyed with the Pets, 64's, AppleII's, IBM's, and Amigas, and in all cases I
found it easier to get things done on everything else but the Amiga.

When I first bought the Amiga, I faced one of my steepest learning curves.
But hey, maybe I just find this type of programming harder.  I didn't know
all of you had such an easier time learning to program it (compared to a few
of the aforementioned systems).

So what's wrong here ?? :)

And why did some of you (you know who you are!) out there resort to more
than friendly :) replies?  I took those messages with the utmost respect and
care.

-jc
--
Joseph Chung
== You can always find what you're not looking for! ==
laba-1ei@web.berkeley.edu