Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!leah!bingvaxu!bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu!consp13
From: consp13@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (Marcus Cannava)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: AmigaDOS/WorkBench 2.0 discussions...
Message-ID: <3567@bingvaxu.CC.BINGHAMTON.EDU>
Date: 5 Jun 90 22:51:20 GMT
References: <2994@crash.cts.com>
Sender: usenet@bingvaxu.CC.BINGHAMTON.EDU
Reply-To: consp13@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (Marcus Cannava)
Organization: SUNY Binghamton
Lines: 31

In article <2994@crash.cts.com>, seanc@pro-party.cts.com (Sean
Cunningham) writes:
|> 
|>I've just got one question...what will the final version of 2.0 look like,
|>when it's frozen in ROM?  How many of you have noticed the dissimilarities
|>among versions of 2.0?  I have seen FOUR...subtle differences, but they were
|>there.  Go look at the A3000 setup at your local dealership.  Then
look at the
|>screen-shots in the system's manual.  Now go look at the photos in BYTE and
|>AmigaWorld.  While the overall look was the same, 3-D windows, more
|>convienient sliders, and a triangular window resizer...check out the top
|>window gadgets, the close, zoom, and depth gadgets.  
|> 
|>How many others can YOU spot?;^)
|>

Even subtler, a dealer here has an A3000 with
the beta-2.0, and he says it's very different
from the 2.0 running on another dealer's A3000
in Buffalo! The OS2.0 you see now is far from
the 'final' version.

Latest info has it that the A3000 ships on 
June 18.

			\marc
 
==============
                                
'I do not fear computers.. I fear the lack of them'  -- I. Asimov
									RNM