Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!darkstar!helios!terry From: terry@helios.ucsc.edu (Terry Ricketts) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Disk recall notice Message-ID: <4209@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 8 Jun 90 16:48:13 GMT References: <113@fishpond.UUCP> <1990Jun6.224027.13036@cbnewsm.att.com> <4158@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <15425@s.ms.uky.edu> Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Reply-To: terry@helios.ucsc.edu (Terry Ricketts) Distribution: usa Organization: UCO/Lick Observatory, Santa Cruz Lines: 24 In article <15425@s.ms.uky.edu> phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti) writes: > Actually, no; not from their point of view. Sure, this will do absolutely >nothing against all the PD Tetris clones out there; but that isn't the point >of their action. > Under US copyright law, if you do not defend your copyright, you _lose_ >your copyright. I believe this is still true under the Berne convention. >Since they found out about the PD Tetris, they were obligated to take >action. If they had not, then it would have been very easy for other >_commercial_ publishers to whip together a Tetris clone and publish it >for money. I am not trying to argue the right or wrong of the clones copying the game. That is not the point anymore. Though I don't think you can copyright the concept of falling blocks, that doesn't matter eithor. The point is that SH simply waited too long to take action. There have been Tetris clones out for several years now, for almost every computer available. In fact Xanth has the source for tetris running under unix with X windows. They should have been after the original authors several years ago. To go after Fred now is silly. Fred may ask for a recall, but I would bet that less than 1% of those disks will be returned. So even that is a hopeless attempt to contain the spread of the clones. There comes a time when you must honestly look at the situation and admit that it is too late to change it. About all SH is going to do at this point is get people angry at them which is counterproductive (even if they are right). Have we forgotten what happened to SEA when they tried to defend their 'rights' against Phil Katz?