Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!van-bc! From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Pipes Message-ID: <1698@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: 5 Jun 90 23:00:43 GMT Lines: 20 Return-Path: To: van-bc!rnews In <2533@zipeecs.umich.edu>, gilgalad@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin) writes: >Anybody got any idea when C= is going to get around to writing true pipes >(ala UNIX)? I suppose that I'm probably going to get flamed all over >the place for this one 8-) > > Thanks, Ralph No flames from me. I am all for Unix-like pipes, and use PIP:, as supplied with ConMan. CBM's PIPE: device is just to restrictive for me. I don't know when they are going to do them, but until then, I heartily recommend PIP: -larry -- The raytracer of justice recurses slowly, but it renders exceedingly fine. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | // Larry Phillips | | \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+