Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!cmm1
From: cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: QuickST vs TurboST
Message-ID: <1990Jun5.011452.16818@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 5 Jun 90 01:14:52 GMT
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Reply-To: cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 16

I am curious.  Which is faster, TurboST or QuickST?  I know QuickST
is much cheaper and comes with extra tools, but what do the raw
speed numbers look like?  I don't own either, but I became a bit 
curious after reading an article in Computer Shopper which mentioned
both "software blitters."

Any info would be appreciated.

Chris

------------------------------+---------------------------
Chris Mauritz                 |Donde hay una cerveza
cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu   |hay un plan.
(c)All rights reserved.       |
Send flames to /dev/null      |El Guerrero Aereo es el rey!
------------------------------+---------------------------