Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!rmacgreg
From: rmacgreg@cs.strath.ac.uk (Sorcerer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: QuickST vs TurboST
Message-ID: <3952@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk>
Date: 6 Jun 90 13:08:38 GMT
References: <1990Jun5.011452.16818@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: rmacgreg@cs.strath.ac.uk
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Scotland.
Lines: 16

In article <1990Jun5.011452.16818@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) writes:
>I am curious.  Which is faster, TurboST or QuickST? 

As far as I can tell there is no difference between them.  QuickST is 
incompatible with some other DA's and TurboST tends to be incompatible with
the same ones (though not always).

	The Sorcerer

                     ___
 _____              /         (rmacgreg @ uk.ac.strath.cs)
   |   |__   __    /___  ___  ___  ___ ___  ___  ___  ___
   |   |  | |__|      / /  / /  / /   /__/ /  / /__/ /  /
   |   |  | |__   ___/ /__/ /    /__ /__  /    /__  / 

            is 'Only visiting this planet.'